The beeb’s article Missouri gun murders ‘rose after law repeal’ says that an upcoming (but currently unavailable) study from the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research “provides some of the most compelling evidence yet for tighter gun controls in the US.”

Apparently it does so by linking the removal of a legal requirement for background checks prior to handgun purchase with a rise in gun homicides. That correlation seems pretty likely, I think; if you intend to kill someone, and you can easily get a gun, why would you use anything else? It’s so obvious as to be almost a tautology.

A good see that site purchase levitra in canada sexual performance increases pleasure in your love-life. This is applied directly on the patient and starts working faster than the tablets.Another reason to choose Kamagra jelly is because it is a good alternative to viagra low cost or 20mg viagra or the tablets of any strength, you should first try this tablets. When you see viagra india prices advertised for $2 a pill, which should raise a flag of caution somewhere in your mind that something is wrong. This herb has a large number of curative properties which viagra generic cheap have been explained and proven time and time again. But I will be interested in seeing how this plays out, since the FBI says that homicides overall went down in Missouri during the same period the study claims that gun homicides went up. This has been the national trend; homicides mostly decreasing as gun ownership has trended steadily upwards.

It seems to me that anti-gun crusaders don’t really argue any more honestly than the NRA’s anti-Obama basket cases.